Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tomb Raider: Underworld"

Revision as of 00:30, 6 March 2009

Do not edit this page if you don't know what you are doing. The next one who leaves the image broken will get banned! The original box-artwork will replace the stand-in image when available. --tombraidergirl 15:53, 30 December 2007 (CET)

If you add information about a level, an opponent and so on which has not been confirmed by Eidos (in words or image) but you have it from a valid source (e.g. a games magazine), state your source, otherwise it will be deleted without question. Again and again, till you have a source. --tombraidergirl 11:23, 10 June 2008 (CEST)

This article at Eidos Forums [1] is using this page to show that Wiki Raider is a substandard source of information. (For example, Mexico is not in South America.) How much of this page is speculation? Does it have solid source references, and should they all be listed at the base of the page? Ostercy 18:07, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Sources are listed at the bottom of the page. I change the Mexico error, Central America of course... Everyone has to know how to read a wiki. At any given time there will be something wrong in an article, but most of what's written is what we know at the moment and it's provided with a source. It seems that someone was confused by Xibalba being listed among the other Underworlds and not alongside Mexico, well I guess it can be put either place, it is an underworld and it is "part of" Mexico.

The statements at the end of "story" which contain ending spoilers are not marked as such, contain numerous typos and grammatical errors, and do not cite their source. I'm new here so I won't presume to remove them, but I'm adding a 'citation needed' tag to them for now. --JakeARoonie 03:55, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

I had to remove spoilers from the story posted by Tombraider1. Such actions are unacceptable. JakeARoonie, please feel free to remove anything else like that if you see it, regardless if you're new. Thank you for your concern.

--Catracoth 17:18, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Do we want a link to at least one walkthrough on this page? Ostercy

Actually, Eric Lindstrom did say that the DLC was developed from content that wasn't good enough to be in Underworld - The “Eric Lindström” posts. For example; "… it is absolutely true that part of the DLC came from elements cut from Underworld, and it is absolutely false that this was done because the DLC was looking thin. I am the one who proposed and decided the cuts, and it was unrelated to DLC. " Ostercy 25th Feb 2009

"Out Now" crap

Guys, guys... who did remove the release dates? That sucks, no one wants to read that it's out now, but you might want to look up later when it arrived... I will be redoing the dates now. LEAVE THEM! --tombraidergirl 13:25, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

I did it once; user PatrickHickey started replacing the dates with 'Out Now' - I wasn't sure if the dates should stay or have the Out Nows stay, so I didn't revert back to the dates. I apologise for that. Catracoth 21:33, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

No problem. I just think that out now has no relevance, does it? ;-) --tombraidergirl 23:30, 5 March 2009 (UTC)