Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gods"
From WikiRaider
(New page: why weren't natla,qualopec and tihocan(from my original article) allowed to be on this one if they have already been proven to be gods?) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
why weren't natla,qualopec and tihocan(from my original article) allowed to be on this one if they have already been proven to be gods? | why weren't natla,qualopec and tihocan(from my original article) allowed to be on this one if they have already been proven to be gods? | ||
| + | |||
| + | I made some modifications | ||
| + | cause I don't think Natla,Tihocan or qualopec should be removed from this article,as they are indeed gods | ||
| + | so I hope you like | ||
Revision as of 03:29, 7 February 2009
why weren't natla,qualopec and tihocan(from my original article) allowed to be on this one if they have already been proven to be gods?
I made some modifications cause I don't think Natla,Tihocan or qualopec should be removed from this article,as they are indeed gods so I hope you like
